Charm City Baltimore Real Estate: Baltimore, Maryland Real Estate & Homes

Every real estate agent I know is thankful that 2010 is nearly over. When the year began there was a lot of hope that the housing market would begin to recover by year’s end, and the Federal Homebuyer Tax Credit was stirring people to buy — boosting that hope.

But when that credit expired, hopes for the recovery began to expire as well. One of the hottest summers in memory kept people inside, and the economic news kept us all sweating. Late summer and early autumn sales numbers retreated back to levels that were equal to the worst of the housing slump.

Never mind that housing prices continued to fall and started to look like good values again, or that mortgage interest rates had fallen to levels that hadn’t been seen since our grandparents had been buying homes. No amount of good news could convince the buying public that it was time to make a purchase.

One of the most important trends of 2010 is only now beginning to become plain: the huge number of properties in distress — either 90+ days late on the mortgage, listed as a short sale, in pre-foreclosure, or actually foreclosed upon and bank-owned — was creating a large “shadow inventory” of homes that lenders were not listing for sale because buyers were not absorbing the distressed properties that already were on the market.

There are a couple of sources for this information. In late November, CoreLogic released a report on the large increase in the “shadow inventory” in 2010. As of August, there were 2.1 million units of housing classified as being in that shadowy group, up more than 10% from the previous year. When added to the 4.2 million “visible” units currently for sale, that constitutes a distressed property glut that isn’t moving. According to CoreLogic’s report, Maryland has a two-year supply of such distressed properties; the figure for Baltimore-Towson is only slightly better, with an 18-month supply.

While the sharp and rapid rise in the number of properties included in this category is alarming, at the same time overall sales figures were falling, and the proportion of distressed homes within the number being sold also fell. According to the National Association of Realtors’ 2010 Homebuyer Survey, only four percent of buyers purchased a home that would be categorized as “distressed.” Nearly 40% of those buyers did not even consider a distressed property among their home choices. Of the remaining 60% who at least considered such a home, one-third decided against it because the process of dealing with the lender as seller was too difficult or complex. One-fourth decided against it because the house was in poor condition; the remaining buyers just couldn’t find a distressed property that they liked.

What does this mean? Different professionals will come to different conclusions about this data, all of which was just released at the end of November, but here are two things that I believe are clear:

1. Buyers are learning that purchasing a distressed property, especially a short sale, is not easy and the vast majority of them are opting not to do so. Since half of all homebuyers in 2010 were first-time homebuyers, it might be that the uncertainty of how long it will take to settle such properties makes them impractical. While these first-time buyers don’t have a home to sell, they do have a landlord who requires a set amount of notice to get out of their lease — give notice too soon, they might become homeless; give notice too late, and they might be required to pay extra rent. If lenders want to make these distressed properties more attractive to these buyers they have to standardize the short sale process and get it done in a predictable amount of time.

2. Lenders may have to hold back millions of dollars worth of ‘shadow inventory’ well into the future. That means maintaining these properties in liveable condition for an extended period of time. Most lenders are NOT good at this. While they want to get their money back on these properties, they cannot flood the market with them all at once. Not only will that drive down the price on the properties for sale, it will also drive down the values on the neighboring properties, putting more homeowners “under water” and destabilizing the neighborhood. Since that lender may also hold the mortgages on a significant number of properties in the vicinity, flooding the market with bank-owned properties just drives down the values of the rest of their investment portfolio. So, while they won’t like the idea of holding on to these properties, self-interest will demand that they do.

There are many indicators that actually give hope for a much better 2011. I’ll cover those in January’s post.

I hope all of my readers have a peaceful holiday season, and best wishes for a prosperous new year!

Tweet

Most homebuyers are interested in technologies that will save energy and reduce the monthly utility bills. Reducing energy consumption is also a primary goal of “green” technologies, and there are many ways to reduce the amount of energy you use without having a major impact on your lifestyle.

Owners of existing homes, however, are sometimes reluctant to research this subject because the flashy, high profile technologies, like solar panels, are expensive to implement and inconvenient to try to retrofit into older homes.

Reducing energy consumption is essential, however, both for the long term good of the planet, for assisting stretched household budgets, and — and this may be a surprise — for making your home competitive when you are trying to sell it. Replacing appliances and windows will raise the value of your property considerably, and on top of your monthly savings on energy, will reduce the cost of the improvement by resulting in a higher sales price. How? Most buyers in this market will research the monthly energy costs the current owner is paying, and this information is readily available with a simple phone call to your utility.

So, here are a few suggestions for ways that you can reduce your energy bills, and in the process, update and make your homes more attractive to new owners when that time comes.

1. The first way is the easiest and the cheapest. In fact, you’ll save money from the very first day: Take advantage of utility deregulation in Maryland. Finally, more than a decade after it was enacted, utility deregulation has resulted in real competition for most Maryland utility ratepayers. Check your current bill, and you’ll see a “rate to compare,” which is the amount your electrical supplier is charging for electricity.

Be aware of the fact that your electrical supplier is now separated from the company that delivers the power to your home. The delivery company will remain your local utility. You will receive your bill from them, as always, and call them if there is a power outage.

Make sure that your new supplier beats that “rate to compare”, doesn’t make you sign a long-term contract, doesn’t charge you to switch (or to leave), and doesn’t lock you into a particular rate. Rates go up dramatically in the summer, and come back down in winter. Its in the consumer’s interest to let that rate float, not be locked in at an inflated price. The supplier that I’ve recommended, who meets all of those criteria, and who offers the additional bonus of buying green wind-generated power, is Viridian. You can research this company, and switch your supplier if you wish, all online at www.viridian.com/charmcity. A list of all the companies that are currently licensed by the Public Service Commission is available at http://webapp.psc.state.md.us/Intranet/SupplierInfo/searchSupplier_E.cfm.

2. Pay attention to those Energy Star labels when you are replacing appliances, especially refrigerators, washers and dryers, and water heaters. According to the US Department of Energy, these appliances are accountable for about 20% of your home’s energy consumption. Older appliances, pre-1990 vintage, can consume double the energy of their new replacements. And until the end of 2010, there’s a Federal tax credit of up to $1,500 for the purchase of energy efficient products, like the new line of tankless water heaters, which are on average 24-34% more energy efficient than conventional storage tank water heaters.

3. Are your windows old and falling apart? Replacing them with more efficient models can save up to 25% of your winter heating bills and 15% of your summer cooling expense. Properly installed, modern windows are also a huge selling point for a new owner, and they can make your life a lot more comfortable.

The US Department of Energy maintains a website which outlines these type of improvements, their relative benefits, and — if you’re not ready to do any of these types of replacements — can offer ideas for inexpensive alternatives, all of which will reduce your energy bottom line and reduce our usage of fossil fuels. You can access that website at http://www1.eere.energy.gov/consumer/tips/index.html.

Tweet

Nobody can tell you for sure what happens on May 1. No, that’s not the day on the Mayan calendar when the world is supposed to end. That’s still two years away, so you can relax (a little!) about that.

May 1 happens to be the day after the Federal tax credit expires for home purchases. As a Realtor, I’ve paid a great deal of attention to the various predictions — because its my livelihood — but it has great implications for the health of the financial sector, for the economy in general, and for how quickly the country can climb back out of the hole created by the Bush Administration and the Great Recession. Most pundits I’ve heard or listened to seem to think that the housing market will slow down again, but they seem to divide into two camps based on their reasons.

Borrowing Buyers

The first group of gloomy pundits advance the idea that because of the tax breaks, we’ve been borrowing buyers from the future; sucking them into the process sooner, rather than later, and so after April 30 we will have a vacuum of buyers for some length of time. This is the group of people who felt that the automobile program, “Cash for Clunkers,” would do exactly the same thing for the auto market — cause buyers to jump in before they were planning on it. Now, if you look at the recent auto sales and the current stock prices of Ford and GM, you’ll see that simply didn’t happen.

It won’t happen with the housing market, either. Homebuyers do not buy homes on a whim. Its a major investment and it can’t be rushed. This has been true especially because the IRS refused to bow to pressure to make the tax credit available to buyers at the settlement table. That meant the buyer had to have their own cash in hand, qualify for the financing to buy, pay all the normal expenses, and then wait for the tax rebate later. I can’t say that I know of anyone who suddenly decided to accelerate their homebuying schedule because of the government program. I believe the tax credit did coax out buyers who had been on the sidelines for the previous three years, watching home prices slide, and who then — like savvy investors — were poised to come out and land a bargain.

Unhappy Rabbits

The second group of gloomy pundits might be compared to Marilyn Monroe in All About Eve, when she surveys a room and asks, “Why do they all look like unhappy rabbits?” This group believe that homebuyers are skittish, and as soon as the tax credit disappears, they will all hop back to their rabbit holes and hide.

The latest economic data says otherwise. March consumer spending rose much more than expected, consumer confidence is rising, and the stock market exudes the robust energy that led Newsweek to declare on their cover that “America is Back.” Now, we still have major problems to overcome: unemployment needs to come down, a second wave of foreclosures needs to be effectively softened by Federal programs to help homeowners stay in their homes, and who knows what else might be lurking around the corner. However, I am already working with buyers who knew from the beginning that they would not be able to qualify for the tax credit, and they are buying on their schedule, not the government’s.

Pundits in the early 1990s predicted that the recession we were experiencing then would be long, and deep. They predicted that the entire decade would be swallowed up by slow economic growth and higher than normal unemployment. They were wrong, totally and completely, and the Nineties turned out to be one of the most prosperous decades in our history.

I have no reason to think that today’s pundits are any more qualified or accurate as fortune tellers. So, what can I do for you today?

Real estate news is saturating the business media lately, because so many people realize that the health of the real estate market is crucial to the nation’s economic recovery. The problem is the news can be confusing. One day you hear that foreclosure activity was down (which is good) but still much higher than one year ago (which is bad). The next day you hear that pending sales for last month were down (which is bad) but much better than one year ago (which is good). So, what do these confusing news reports do to your attitude if you are thinking about taking advantage of the $8,000 tax credit and buying a home this spring? Are you choosing to focus on the good news or the bad news?

Well, here are four items that are not getting a lot of coverage. Taken together, these four facts should leave no doubt in your mind that this is possibly the best time to buy real estate in at least a generation.

1. Prices are down, and in many areas are still falling — although more slowly than last year. If you’re a buyer of real estate in this market, you are definitely seeing lots of inventory and you’re seeing it at lower prices than you are accustomed to. The fact that the rate of decline is slowing means we’re near or at the bottom, and in some areas prices are actually stabilizing and beginning to make very small advances. Generally speaking, your dollar buys you more house now than at any time in the last five years, and it might not get any better than this.

2. Interest rates are at historic lows. The cost of borrowing the money you need to buy your home is incredibly affordable right now. And the fact that we can actually say both of these things at the same time is itself historic. In the last fifty years we’ve had many periods of time where either prices were low or rates were low, but its nearly unheard of to be able to say both at the same time. So, not only does your dollar buy more house, the interest you’ll pay on that dollar is very cheap by historical standards.

So, we have these two incredible opportunities existing — three, counting the $8,000 tax credit available until the end of April. But, I hear you ask, “How can we be sure that this situation won’t go on for awhile?” That’s where the last two of my four facts come into play.

3. Interest rates won’t stay this low for long. Most economists agree that when the economy starts to gain real steam, fear of inflation and the national debt will force the Federal Reserve to increase its interest rates to banks, who will then pass that increase along to consumers. We could be looking at substantial increases over time, which will leave you kicking yourself for not acting while the cost of borrowing money was so low.

4. Statistics point to a potential housing shortage in a few years. There are a couple of things at work here. First, new home builders have cut way back on their building to “ride out” the recession. It will take awhile for them to get construction back underway and lay out and design new housing developments once they see buyers coming back to their model homes. Second, there is a new wave of homeowners beginning to search: the “echo boomers,” or the children of the Baby Boom generation. This generation is estimated to be 50% larger than the original Baby Boom itself, and they are now roughly in the 18-31 age range: prime first-time homebuying years. Basic supply and demand will rule the day: housing will be in short supply and prices will rise.

There you have four very good reasons to step back from the day to day news cycle and take a long view about home ownership. So, what can I do for you today?

I recently asked Richard Pazornik of SunTrust, one of my recommended loan officers, to sit down and walk through a Question and Answer session with me so that we could fully explain the new 2010 housing credit for homebuyers. As you probably know, the initial tax credit from 2008 was beefed up in mid 2009 when Congress increased the amount of the credit and stopped requiring that it be paid back over time. That program was supposed to expire at the end of November, 2009.  But last Fall, the housing and mortgage industries pushed to have the credit extended.  For a while, Congress seemed to be willing to let the credit expire, which would have had a devastating impact on the housing market which was struggling to stand up again.

Fortunately, Congress and the President were eventually persuaded that extending the credit was in the best interest of the economic recovery.

W: So would you go over how the tax credit works?

R: For first-time homebuyers, which means someone who hasn’t owned a home in the last three years, you’ll get that same $8,000 tax credit if you sign a contract to buy a home before midnight April 30th, 2010 and you have to go to settlement before midnight June 30th, 2010.  Hopefully, we will be very busy those two days!

The new Tax Credit also sets a maximum income at $125,000 for a single person and $225,000 for a married couple.  Above those limits, the credit is phased out.

W: Now, Congress has expanded the credit to “move-up” buyers. What does that mean?

R: A “move up” buyer can now get a tax credit of $6,500, if they’ve lived in their home continuously for 5 of the last 8 years as their primary residence.
The same income limits and phase outs apply to move up buyers as applied to first-time homebuyers.

W: Can someone buy any house on the market?

R: They can buy any house as their primary home so long as it’s priced less than $800,000.  So here in Baltimore, this covers about 96% or more of all the homes listed in the Multiple Listing Service.

The government sweetened the deal by allowing taxpayers to go back and amend their prior year tax returns to claim the tax credit quicker and if your above the income limits in 2010, go back an look at your 2009 income, you might be better off!

W: What’s the difference between a Tax Credit and a Tax Deduction?

R: Well, a tax credit is a lot better than a tax deduction.  A credit is a dollar for dollar reduction of your tax bill and a tax deduction only saves you a portion of the amount based upon your actual tax rate.  Now, I wouldn’t turn either down, but I’d much rather have an $8,000 tax credit than an $8,000 tax deduction.  And here’s why, if you’re in a 20% tax bracket an $8,000 deduction would save you $1,600 in taxes but the $8,000 tax credit actually saves you $8,000 in taxes.   That’s why this credit is so good! But, there’s a warning I need to give.  If you sell the house within three years then you must repay the $8,000.

W: So, let’s say I’m a regular wage-earner who has taxes deducted from my pay. How would this tax credit work?

R: It means your tax bill is actually decreased by $8,000.  So for example, if you had $5,000 deducted from your salary for your Federal Income taxes and your tax bill computed to be $2,000, normally, you would’ve received a refund of $3,000.  But, if you sign a contract to buy a house before April 30, 2010 and it settles before June 30, 2010, when you file your taxes in April of 2011, you’ll not only receive the refund of $3,000, but you’ll also get an additional tax credit of $8,000 making your total refund $11,000.

W: That’s a nice piece of change! So what is your overall impression of this new program?

R: Overall, I’m thrilled that the Homebuyer Tax Credit was extended and expanded and here are the 3 keys to remember;

• Income, $125k single, or  $225k couple
• Home Price, $800000 or less, and
• Contract, signed by April 30, 2010 for settlement by June 30, 2010.

While the market has been flooded with good news in the last few weeks, an end of the year reflection still shows we have lots of work to do in the new year.

For a transcript of this podcast, please email me at .

As we begin the last month of the year, I wanted to review where we stand in the real estate world, both nationally and in Maryland. 2010 will be a critical year for many of us, not only for those involved with property, but for the economy in general.

We’re certainly better off in this holiday season than we were a year ago. At the end of 2008 the country felt like a roller coaster car speeding down the tallest slope with no brake and nobody at the switch. Right now, 2009 looks like the turning point, with the economy beginning its long climb up the next hill, real estate stabilizing and just in need of a little push to get back on the track. But there are several issues looming for next year which will really determine how things go for the forseeable future. Here are a few lumps of coal for your stocking:

• A recent Washington Post article quoted a national survey by the Mortgage Bankers Association which found that more than 14 percent of borrowers were in trouble on their mortgage. That translates into 7.4 million households either currently delinquent or in the foreclosure process, the highest level this particular survey has ever recorded. That means we have not seen the peak of foreclosures — and with unemployment continuing to rise the numbers will only get worse.
• The Baltimore Sun, again using information from the Mortgage Bankers Association, reported that in Maryland roughly 10 percent of homeowners deemed good credit risks were in trouble with their mortgage. We’re not talking subprime mortgages here, the widely known source of the financial troubles, but prime borrowers. Again, blame rising unemployment which has destabilized the family budgets of people who have had a history of prudent financial management. In round numbers, this adds 77,000 homeowners to the list of those at least one month behind on their payments.
• Recent widely reported gains in regional home sales and a decrease in the housing inventory seems to be coming from short sales and foreclosures going under contract (and not necessarily going to settlement). From my anecdotal sources, traffic on regular owner-occupied listings — where a bank is not involved — is practically non-existent. This means that unless you’re in distress and buyers smell blood, they aren’t interested in seeing your listing. And, as we saw in the last item, there could be 77,000 more properties on that distressed list that we have to work through next spring.
• Most of our buyers, especially first time homebuyers,  in the last year have used FHA loans because they had the least stringent requirements for credit score and money down, and allowed more generous assistance from Sellers. So while the extension of the tax credits until the end of June, 2010 is a wonderful thing, it seems to be coming with a simultaneous tightening of credit from the FHA. The Washington Post reports that new FHA guidelines currently under development will raise the amount of money required from buyers — from 3.5% of the purchase price to 5% of purchase price — while cutting the allowed Seller contribution in half (from 6% to 3%). Not only will this shrink the pool of qualified buyers considerably, the FHA will also raise the capitalization required from lenders who issue FHA insured loans — a move that will most likely cut the number of loans available, if not the number of lenders who will consider issuing them.

Certainly the situation in residential real estate is worrysome as we head into the new year. But it might not be the most dangerous. Many experts are warning that the biggest problem looming on the horizon is in the commercial real estate market, as last week’s potential meltdown at Dubai World illustrated. While that particular sovereign wealth fund made European markets tremble, and we were told that the US market has little exposure to it, there are enough potential problems here at home to make us weak in the knees. Moody’s Investor Services reported last week that it expects the value of US commercial real estate to continue to fall well into 2011. This is on top of losses in this sector which have already totalled 42.9% since the peak in 2007. The total devaluation from the peak may well reach 55% before things begin to turn around.

The determining factor in these losses? Yep, you guessed it… unemployment. With fewer people working, office spaces and commercial spaces don’t need to be as big. Demand for office buildings drops, and fewer companies are growing and demanding more space from their landlords. Also, with more people encouraged to buy homes and get their tax credit, demand for multifamily rental units has also dropped, hurting landlords’ cash flow and making it more difficult for them to keep up on their mortgages.

Now, with all this coal in your stocking, remember you can’t really burn it anymore to lower your heating bills. Global warming, you know. Ho, ho, ho.

The Senate of the United States has passed legislation that not only extends the $8000 tax credit for first time homebuyers, but that expands the stimulus and offers a $6500 credit for current homeowners (who have been in their homes at least five years) to sell and move up into a new primary residence. Both of these would be available for contracts ratified by the end of April, 2010 and that settle before the end of June.

When I called for the extension and expansion of the credit in this blog a few months ago, not many of my colleagues gave the proposal much chance of actually coming to pass. Thank goodness there was one civic minded Republican and former Realtor, Johnny Isaacson from Georgia, who was able to give a bi-partisan impetus to the measure and who has championed it through. The House of Representatives now must pass the bill and send it to the President, who has indicated he will sign it.

Hopefully this will coax skittish buyers back into the market, and give encouragement to the many families who are sitting tight in their now-too-small homes to jump into the real estate market to move up.

Housing led us down into this mess, and in order for public confidence to stabilize and for people to start feeling better about the economy, housing must lead us out. This bill is good, public-spirited legislation that points out the constructive role that the government can play in economic affairs, if politicians could simply get their own ambitions out of the way. Its too much to hope that this effort will lead to other bi-partisan efforts. But that is what the country needs right now.

It’s time for me to take a position on a controversial discussion beginning to take place around our offices, and in Washington.

Congress should act quickly to not just extend the Homebuyer Tax Credit, but it should also be expanded to cover more transactions and move beyond first-time homebuyers. Our marketplace is still very fragile. The real estate market, admittedly, was the starting point of this severe recession and needs to be supported so that the “tender green shoots” of recovery continue to grow and spread into next year. We will have new foreclosures entering the market, new short sales, and continuing economic distress long after the current expiration date of November 30. Its likely, in my opinion, that the housing market will shrink in the new year without this stimulus — which could jeopardize the health of the economy. The reasons for extension are perfectly clear.

The argument for expansion is equally compelling. First, the existing first-time buyer credit has jump started the under $250,000 segment of the marketplace, but in our area it has not had a similar effect on ‘move-up’ homes or ‘downsizing’ condominiums. To begin to spread the wealth, and help struggling homeowners out of economic distress, or the growing family feeling the pinch in a terrible economy, expansion of the tax credit to those segments would have an incredible effect on associated businesses and communities. There’s very little stimulus that would have the same impact for each dollar invested, not only in actual capital investments but also consumer sentiment, arresting the slide of home values and shoring them up against further upheaval.

In order to make the distribution of these monies is equitable, the eligible properties could be defined as those falling under the regionally adjusted FHA loan guidelines. That would effectively exclude investors and the very wealthy whose properties would require non-FHA ‘jumbo’ loans. This is an idea whose time is right now.