mortgages

Spring Home Buying Primer

Ever since the groundhog predicted an early spring, most of us have been eagerly waiting for the little guy to be proven right.  And while the weather makes it a day-to-day affair to know if winter is truly over, from the real estate data coming out lately it seems that spring truly has arrived early.

 

February 2011 statistics show that in the Baltimore region, home sales were up 7% over February of 2010.  Down in the Washington metro area, which includes nearby Montgomery and Prince George’s Counties, pending home sales in February increased a whopping 33% over the same month a year earlier. The median home price in February 2011 in the DC region was $300,000, down from $309,000 the year before — but Baltimore’s median home price in February 2011 was $205,350, down from February 2010′s by 9.54%.  So, Baltimore metro still remains a much more affordable alternative for Washington-area homebuyers, even with price declines, and a lot of the activity here has come from DC residents looking for less expensive housing, a trend we expect to continue.

 

All of this is good news, unless you happen to be selling a home right now. From a seller’s perspective, the overriding issue is the number of distressed properties currently flooding the market and driving prices down. Most buyers enter the market eager to snap up a bargain, but not fully informed as to exactly what it means to them to buy a distressed property, or the differences between the types of distressed property currently on the market. So here’s a brief overview to get you up to speed.

 

The largest category of distressed properties include homes listed for sale that are “under water” — where the owner owes more than the house could currently sell for in the market.

 

Short sales are where a seller, who is under water, also doesn’t have the money to make up the difference and has to ask the lender to forgive the amount of the shortfall. Short sales get their name from this seller’s shortfall, not from the amount of time they take to settle — which is anything BUT short. Generally, the seller is still in the home and has listed the house as a short sale in consultation with their bank or institutional lender. The mortgage is still in place, as are all the investors who bought into that mortgage once it went to the private equity market. Sometimes there is a second mortgage, and yet another set of investors. Before a property can reach the settlement table and transfer to a new owner, the current seller has to negotiate a contract with a qualified buyer and then start to make the case to the lender(s) that he/she will require financial assistance to sell the property. If the lender(s) accept the fact that the seller is truly in distress, they then have to go to their investors and get them to agree to take the loss. All of this has to take place before the lender can notify the buyer if the contract offer will be acceptable — even if the contract has been signed by the seller.

 

This process is long and tedious. Buyers and their agents can only wait on the sidelines while the lender(s) and investors  go back and forth with the current owner to satisfy all the paperwork requirements. In today’s market it is not unusual for a short sale to take more than three months to settle, nor is it uncommon for a buyer to wait three months to discover that their offer will not be accepted by the lender at all. Most first-time buyers, who are dealing with a landlord who needs a specific date upon which his rental apartment will be vacant, cannot consider short sales as a viable option.

 

Foreclosures are where the lender has evicted the previous owner, passed the loss along to the investors who are now out of the picture, and has taken ownership of the property. Foreclosures are usually listed for less than market price, which is why they tend to drive down property values in the area.

 

Foreclosures present a completely different set of challenges from the buyer’s perspective. With the previous owner and the investors gone, the chain of authority for decision making is much clearer, but the bureaucratic nature of most lenders removes much of the give and take you’d find in a real negotiation. Listing prices are usually set with a businesslike efficiency, and routinely reduced on a four to six week schedule if no qualified buyer has surfaced. In between reductions, there is usually little flexibility on price. Many buyers think the bank will be desperate to negotiate and get rid of the property, only to have their opening low offer rejected in short order because it is too far below the current listing price.

 

A majority of foreclosures also need some level of renovation before they can be occupied. While this can be a great way to get a newly renovated house at a good price, many first time buyers are not ready to handle the purchase experience and then jump immediately into working with a contractor to complete a four to six week renovation.

 

If you’re a buyer in this market, do your homework, and you can truly use the current distress to your advantage and end up with equity in your new home from day one. But be realistic about your goals and your abilities, and if you don’t think your life will allow you to deal with the uncertainties of a short sale or the responsibilities of a renovation, stick to conventional non-distressed listings with individual sellers where the timeframe and the purchasing process is much more predictable.

Share This Post

Is it time to buy or rent?

For several years, the answer for many first time buyers was “rent.” That may be changing.

For a transcript of this podcast, please email me at info@charmcityrealestate.com.

Share This Post

Podcast: Home Buyer 101

First of three podcasts presenting an overview of the material presented at an in-person buyer seminar. In this episode: evaluating and selecting your real estate agent and loan officer.

For a transcript of this podcast, please email me at info@charmcityrealestate.com.

Share This Post

Podcast: Home Buyer 102

Second of three podcasts presenting an overview of the material presented at an in-person buyer seminar. In this episode: searching for the right home and writing the offer to purchase.

For a transcript of this podcast, please email me at info@charmcityrealestate.com.

Share This Post

Podcast: Home Buyer 103

Last of three podcasts presenting an overview of the material presented at an in-person buyer seminar. In this episode: the period between contract signing and settlement day.

For a transcript of this podcast, please email me at info@charmcityrealestate.com.

Share This Post

Podcast: Mortgage 201

First in the Mortgage Financing series of podcasts. In this edition, guest podcaster Richard Pazornik of SunTrust Mortgage talks about the loan application process, how to prepare for it, and what to expect.

For a transcript of this podcast, please email me at info@charmcityrealestate.com.

Share This Post

Podcast: Mortgage 202

Second in the Mortgage Financing series of podcasts. In this edition, guest podcaster Tom Latta of Prosperity Mortgage talks about the choice of loan product, downpayment options, and other sources for financial assistance.

For a transcript of this podcast, please email me at info@charmcityrealestate.com.

Share This Post

Podcast: August is bullish on fall market prospects

First in an ongoing series of podcasts, containing an overview of market conditions as we enter the Fall 2009 market.

For a transcript of this podcast, please email me at info@charmcityrealestate.com.

Share This Post

Half empty, or half full?

I have a shocking, truly shocking, piece of information to give you. You better sit down.

2007 was the fifth best year on record for housing sales.

That’s not just hot air, that’s factual data from the National Association of Realtors. Now, I grant you, as someone who makes his living in the real estate industry, it shocked me to read that. It certainly didn’t “feel” like good times. My accountant will confirm that it certainly wasn’t MY fifth best year.

Regular readers of my blog will know that I have regularly taken issue with the way the media has painted the crisis in the housing industry… which really started as a crisis in the MORTGAGE industry. But the NAR statistics seem to confirm something that has been noted for many years — it is no longer fruitful to treat the US economy as one monolithic entity. We are a collection of regional economies, and whether it was the “rolling recession” in the nineties that seemed to affect only a region or two at a time, or the current housing situation, there is an argument to be made that much of the pain is centered in a handful of regions.

Recent stories in the Wall Street Journal have shown maps showing where the foreclosure rate has spiked, and a story on National Public Radio this morning (4/16) talked about a critical drop of 24% in housing values in Southern California. But there have been relatively few stories about the strength of housing in certain markets like New York City. I’m going to speculate that the housing markets are worse in areas where the economic trouble is deepest. (Not a high risk speculation, to be sure.) The mortgage/financial industry disaster is certainly having a national ripple effect, but the breathless disaster coverage on the 24-hour news networks, loves to paint a national picture where one really doesn’t exist.

The newspapers — normally a bastion of more thoughtful coverage — seem to be trying to compete with the television networks over who can cry the loudest. None of which is in the best interest of the country. Everyone wants to put their own political spin on it as well, whether its a conservative Republican laissez-faire approach (from the mouth of John “Herbert Hoover” McCain) or the more reactionary, desperate Clinton Campaign (Tell the banks when they can and can’t foreclose! Prohibit them from adjusting their mortgage rates on schedule! Shoot ducks! Drink beer!)

I wish we’d all just act like grownups.

Share This Post

Herbert Hoover, redux

Shades of 1929.

While the financial markets are involved in daily triple-digit fluctuations, major financial services companies are in danger of going under or being bought at fire sale prices, and economic statistics and Federal Reserve actions unseen since the Great Depression are being reported, the President of the United States is in front of the public saying that everything is fine. The State of the Union is strong. The danger is in over-correcting, like the proverbial pickup being driven through a “rough patch” and we don’t want to “end up in the ditch.”

At least Herbert Hoover could utter an educated, well-parsed phrase.

He ended up being just as wrong, just as short-sighted, and just as reviled by history as this president will be for being so insulated in his wealthy, privileged world that he had no clue that gasoline would soon reach $4 per gallon. “Really?”

The housing/financial mess was caused by a lack of oversight and regulation. Pure and simple. Each time I hear an explanation of mortgage-backed equity instruments, and how we got to this point, I’m reminded of the fictional Gordon Gekko’s mantra, “Greed is good.” Lots of people made lots of money, and most of them have gotten their golden parachutes and are no longer to be seen. We’re left cleaning up the mess while the buffoon in the White House (and his Republican clone campaigning to replace him) continues to assert that the least action is the best action.

There needs to be federal licensing and regulation of mortgage brokers, strict oversight of lending practices and the information given to prospective borrowers, and a revival of the Depression-era home loan bank so that the government can buy out the mortgages of people who were duped, lied to, or otherwise abused by the system and are now in danger of losing their homes. Let’s let the government rely on the strength and honesty of the working poor and middle class for a change, instead upon the greed and avarice of the upper 1%.

Share This Post